![]() ![]() In that light, locking parameters enables you to simulate something you don't know the cause of but want to see the effect. A magnetic field of 2.5+ radii should make sure your planet doesn't get "stripped"Īnyway, although the argument, changing the starting parameters of a simulation wouldn't be scientifically correct is pretty invalid 1), there is nothing to say against optional parameter locks.ġ)Being able to change the starting parameters of a simulation is the only thing that makes a simulation scientifically useful. At the right temperature the surface water will compensate the atmosphere loss for a time, lowering the surface water level but it keeps escaping. ![]() However, if you place the planet in a running sim, it has no magnetic field at all and the atmosphere will escape. Putting a saved planet will set its effective temperature correctly but the surface takes a bit to actually reach the right temperature (which at Albedo 0.3 is roughly effective temperature+ greenhouse effect=surface temperature). ![]() The changes after placing a saved planet in a new sim occur due to the magnetic field and the surface temperature not being saved. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |